论文标题
物理学家，非物理主题和跨学科性
Physicists, Non Physical Topics, and Interdisciplinarity
论文作者
论文摘要
今天定义跨学科物理学需要首先对当今物理学的重新进行重新制定，这反过来又需要澄清成为物理学家的原因。这项评估是由我四十年的旅程争论和努力建立社会物理学的原因。因此，我对跨学科物理学的看法已经反复跳到相反的方向，然后再解决以下主张：今天的物理学家是处理问题“物理学家”的物理学家所做的。但是，物理学家的培训应限于惰性问题。然而，将重点放在物理学方法的普遍性中，作为研究主题的一般途径。因此，跨学科物理学应成为包括孵化器在内的好奇心的内阁。好奇心的内阁将欢迎所有与任何类型的物体相关的一张纸张，只要它至少由一位物理学家共同撰写。否则，本文应使用物理学的明确技术。如果主题收到许多论文，它将转移到孵化器中，以促进新的适当物理子场的潜在出现。物理领域的社会物理小节所示的过程。
Defining interdisciplinary physics today requires first a reformulation of what is physics today, which in turn calls for clarifying what makes a physicist. This assessment results from my forty year journey arguing and fighting to build sociophysics. My view on interdisciplinary physics has thus evolved jumping repeatedly to opposite directions before settling down to the following claim: today physics is what is done by physicists who handle a problem the "physicist's way". However the training of physicists should stay restricted to inert matter. Yet adding a focus on the universality of the physicist approach as a generic path to investigate a topic. Consequently, interdisciplinary physics should become a cabinet of curiosities including an incubator. The cabinet of curiosities would welcome all one shots papers related to any kind of object provided it is co-authored at least by one physicist. Otherwise the paper should uses explicitly technics from physics. In case a topic gets many papers, it would be moved to the incubator to foster the potential emergence of a new appropriate subfield of physics. A process illustrated by the subsection social physics in Frontiers in physics.
