论文标题
利用深度学习来改善欠发达国家肺炎的早期诊断
Using Deep Learning to Improve Early Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Underdeveloped Countries
论文作者
论文摘要
随着技术和医学的进步,由于成本和缺乏合格的医务人员,许多国家仍无法获得优质的医疗服务。医疗保健中的这种差异导致许多可预防的死亡,要么由于缺乏发现或缺乏护理。世界上最普遍的疾病之一是肺炎,肺部感染了2017年全球256万人口的感染。同年,美国的肺炎死亡率为15.88人,每100000人的人口每100000人的人口每100000人,而撒哈拉以南非洲的大部分,例如查德和几内亚,例如150千年的1000 000 000 000 000 000年。医生和护士的缺乏估计约为240万。被检验的假设是,与预性的图像相比,深度学习模型可以以X射线的形式接收输入,并以医生的等效精度产生诊断。该项目中使用的模型是修改的卷积神经网络。该模型在一组2000 X射线图像上进行了训练,这些图像具有预定的正常和异常的肺发现,然后在一组400张图像上进行了测试,其中包含肺炎和健康肺部的均匀分裂图像。对于每个计算机运行的测试,收集了基础准确性的基础测量以及更具体的指标,例如特异性和灵敏度。结果表明,所测试的算法能够准确地识别出平均82.5%的肺部发现。该模型的最大特异性分别达到98.5%,最大灵敏度分别为90%,这两个指标的同时值最高的值是敏感性90%,特异性为78.5%。可以通过测试其他深度学习模型以及机器学习模型来进一步改善这项研究,以提高公制分数和正确诊断的机会。
As advancements in technology and medicine are being made, many countries are still unable to access quality medical care due to cost and lack of qualified medical personnel. This discrepancy in healthcare has caused many preventable deaths, either due to lack of detection or lack of care. One of the most prevalent diseases in the world is pneumonia, an infection of the lungs that killed 2.56 million people worldwide in 2017. In this same year, the United States recorded a pneumonia death rate of 15.88 people per 100000 in population, while much of Sub-Saharan Africa, such as Chad and Guinea, experienced death rates of over 150 people per 100000. In sub-Saharan Africa, there is an extreme shortage of doctors and nurses, estimated to be around 2.4 million. The hypothesis being tested is that a deep learning model can receive input in the form of an x-ray and produce a diagnosis with the equivalent accuracy of a physician, compared to a prediagnosed image. The model used in this project is a modified convolutional neural network. The model was trained on a set of 2000 x-ray images that have predetermined normal and abnormal lung findings, and then tested on a set of 400 images that contains evenly split images of pneumonia and healthy lungs. For each computer-run test, data was collected on a base measurement of accuracy, as well as more specific metrics such as specificity and sensitivity. Results show that the algorithm tested was able to accurately identify abnormal lung findings an average of 82.5% of the time. The model achieved a maximum specificity of 98.5% and a maximum sensitivity of 90% separately, and the highest simultaneous values of these two metrics was a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 78.5%. This research can be further improved by testing other deep learning models as well as machine learning models to improve the metric scores and chance of correct diagnoses.