论文标题
使用论证计划来建模法律推理
Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning
论文作者
论文摘要
我们提出了论证计划，以通过法律案件对推理进行建模。我们为建立事实后的三个阶段中的每个阶段提供方案：因素归属，发行解决和结果确定。这些方案以特定法律领域，美国商业秘密法的示例进行了说明，讨论了这些计划的更广泛适用性。
We present argumentation schemes to model reasoning with legal cases. We provide schemes for each of the three stages that take place after the facts are established: factor ascription, issue resolution and outcome determination. The schemes are illustrated with examples from a specific legal domain, US Trade Secrets law, and the wider applicability of these schemes is discussed.
