论文标题
由于逆变器规则而导致的生产商能量优化的位置差异受到限制吗?
Can locational disparity of prosumer energy optimization due to inverter rules be limited?
论文作者
论文摘要
为了减轻与可变智能负载和分布式生成的增长相关的问题,分销系统运营商(DSO)现在使其具有具有逆变器的生产者的约束力,可以根据预设规则进行操作。特别是,制造商的最大主动和反应功率设置基于局部电压测量值,以确保逆变器输出不会导致违规电压。但是,这项工作中观察到的这样的行动限制了可用于本地能源管理的范围,而在远离变电站的情况下,套利利润造成了更多的不利损失。该论文的目的是三倍:(a)开发一种最佳的局部能量优化算法,以激活负载灵活性和在随着时间变化的电价下的逆变器交叉互换的太阳能光伏和储能; (b)量化由于不同能源市场中普遍存在的逆变器注入规则而导致的对伪造者套利收益的影响; (c)提出一种计算有效的混合逆变器控制策略,该政策提供了电压调节,同时大大降低了位置差异。使用位于径向馈线不同部分的三个相同部分的三个相同的伪造者上的数值模拟,我们表明我们的控制策略能够最大程度地减少喂食器开始和结束时客户之间套利的位置差异,而PV缩减量则减少了91.7%,而限制性Volt-Volt-Volt-Var和Volt-Var和Volt-Var和Volt-Var和Volt-Vart和Volt-Vart和Volt-Vart策略则减少了91.7%。
To mitigate issues related to the growth of variable smart loads and distributed generation, distribution system operators (DSO) now make it binding for prosumers with inverters to operate under pre-set rules. In particular, the maximum active and reactive power set points for prosumers are based on local voltage measurements to ensure that inverter output does not cause voltage violations. However, such actions, as observed in this work, restrict the range available for local energy management, with more adverse losses on arbitrage profits for prosumers located farther away from the substation. The goal of the paper is three-fold: (a) to develop an optimal local energy optimization algorithm for activation of load flexibility and inverter-interfaced solar PV and energy storage under time-varying electricity prices; (b) to quantify the locational impact on prosumer arbitrage gains due to inverter injection rules prevalent in different energy markets; (c) to propose a computationally efficient hybrid inverter control policy which provides voltage regulation while substantially reducing locational disparity. Using numerical simulations on three identical prosumers located at different parts of a radial feeder, we show that our control policy is able to minimize locational disparity in arbitrage gains between customers at the beginning and end of the feeder to 1.4%, while PV curtailment is reduced by 91.7% compared to the base case with restrictive volt-Var and volt-watt policy.