论文标题
量化附近活跃星系中狭窄线区域外流的反馈。 iv。不同密度估计对电离气体质量和流出速率的影响
Quantifying Feedback from Narrow Line Region Outflows in Nearby Active Galaxies. IV. The Effects of Different Density Estimates on the Ionized Gas Masses and Outflow Rates
论文作者
论文摘要
主动银河核(AGN)可以发射可能影响星系进化的电离气体流出,并量化其全部影响,需要对气体质量,速度和径向电视的空间分辨测量。我们先前报道了在六个低红移AGN中的电离窄线区域(NLR)流出的这些量,其中从哈勃太空望远镜的长距离光谱法确定了气速和范围。但是,计算气体质量需要多组分的光电离世才能解释气体密度的径向变化,这些变化跨度为$ \ sim $ 6 $ 6。为了简化频谱覆盖率较小的较大样品的方法,我们将这些气体质量与文献中的技术进行了比较。首先,我们使用一个重组方程,对径向密度曲线具有三个不同估计值。这些包括恒定密度,源自[S II]的密度以及基于电离参数的常数值($ u $)的幂律概况。其次,我们使用基于常数$ u $的幂律密度配置文件的单组分光电离模型,并允许$ u $根据[O III]/h $β$比例而随半径而变化。我们发现,假设$ n_ \ mathrm {h} = $ 10 $^2 $ cm $^{ - 3} $高估了所有六个流出的气体量,尤其是在流出速率峰值的小半径上,则高估了气体块。 [S II]的使用略恰好与总气体质量相匹配,但在小半径上也高估了。总体而言,当$ u $变化的单一组件光电离心模型在不足的排放线不足以构建详细的模型时,$ u $随着半径而变化。
Active galactic nuclei (AGN) can launch outflows of ionized gas that may influence galaxy evolution, and quantifying their full impact requires spatially resolved measurements of the gas masses, velocities, and radial extents. We previously reported these quantities for the ionized narrow-line region (NLR) outflows in six low-redshift AGN, where the gas velocities and extents were determined from Hubble Space Telescope long-slit spectroscopy. However, calculating the gas masses required multi-component photoionization models to account for radial variations in the gas densities, which span $\sim$6 orders of magnitude. In order to simplify this method for larger samples with less spectral coverage, we compare these gas masses with those calculated from techniques in the literature. First, we use a recombination equation with three different estimates for the radial density profiles. These include constant densities, those derived from [S II], and power-law profiles based on constant values of the ionization parameter ($U$). Second, we use single-component photoionization models with power-law density profiles based on constant $U$, and allow $U$ to vary with radius based on the [O III]/H$β$ ratios. We find that assuming a constant density of $n_\mathrm{H} =$ 10$^2$ cm$^{-3}$ overestimates the gas masses for all six outflows, particularly at small radii where the outflow rates peak. The use of [S II] marginally matches the total gas masses, but also overestimates at small radii. Overall, single-component photoionization models where $U$ varies with radius are able to best match the gas mass and outflow rate profiles when there are insufficient emission lines to construct detailed models.