论文标题
通过数据分析破坏弹性的犯罪网络:西西里黑手党的案例
Disrupting Resilient Criminal Networks through Data Analysis: The case of Sicilian Mafia
论文作者
论文摘要
与其他类型的社交网络相比,犯罪网络由于对破坏的强烈韧性而提出了艰巨的挑战,这给执法机构带来了严重的障碍。本文中,我们借用了从社交网络分析到(i)基于两个现实世界数据集的西西里黑手党帮派结构的方法和工具,以及(ii)有关如何有效破坏它们的见解。由于连接分布和强度,黑手党网络具有独特的特征,这使它们与其他社交网络截然不同,并且对外源性扰动极为强大。分析师还面临着很难收集可靠的数据集,这些数据集准确地描述了帮派的内部结构及其与外部世界的关系,这就是为什么早期的研究在很大程度上是定性的,难以捉摸的和不完整的。我们工作的另一个价值是基于从法律行为得出的原始数据生成了两个现实世界数据集,该数据与2000年代前十年在西西里岛经营的黑手党组织有关。我们分别创建了两个不同的网络,分别捕获了电话和身体会议。我们的网络中断分析模拟了不同的干预程序:(i)一次逮捕一个犯罪分子(删除顺序节点); (ii)警察突袭(删除节点块)。我们通过许多网络中心度指标来衡量每种方法的有效性。我们发现,两者之间的中心性是最有效的度量,表明如何仅中和5%的分支机构,网络连通性下降了70%。我们还确定,由于犯罪网络中特殊类型的相互作用类型(即相互作用频率的分布)在加权和未加权网络分析之间没有显着差异。我们的工作在解决犯罪和恐怖网络方面有重要的实用应用。
Compared to other types of social networks, criminal networks present hard challenges, due to their strong resilience to disruption, which poses severe hurdles to law-enforcement agencies. Herein, we borrow methods and tools from Social Network Analysis to (i) unveil the structure of Sicilian Mafia gangs, based on two real-world datasets, and (ii) gain insights as to how to efficiently disrupt them. Mafia networks have peculiar features, due to the links distribution and strength, which makes them very different from other social networks, and extremely robust to exogenous perturbations. Analysts are also faced with the difficulty in collecting reliable datasets that accurately describe the gangs' internal structure and their relationships with the external world, which is why earlier studies are largely qualitative, elusive and incomplete. An added value of our work is the generation of two real-world datasets, based on raw data derived from juridical acts, relating to a Mafia organization that operated in Sicily during the first decade of 2000s. We created two different networks, capturing phone calls and physical meetings, respectively. Our network disruption analysis simulated different intervention procedures: (i) arresting one criminal at a time (sequential node removal); and (ii) police raids (node block removal). We measured the effectiveness of each approach through a number of network centrality metrics. We found Betweeness Centrality to be the most effective metric, showing how, by neutralizing only the 5% of the affiliates, network connectivity dropped by 70%. We also identified that, due the peculiar type of interactions in criminal networks (namely, the distribution of the interactions frequency) no significant differences exist between weighted and unweighted network analysis. Our work has significant practical applications for tackling criminal and terrorist networks.