学术文献库

Darwin's theory of evolution emphasized that positive selection of functional proficiency provides the fitness that ultimately determines the structure of life, a view that has dominated biochemical thinking of enzymes as perfectly optimized for their specific functions. The 20th-century modern synthesis, structural biology, and the central dogma explained the machinery of evolution, and nearly neutral theory explained how selection competes with random fixation dynamics that produce molecular clocks essential e.g. for dating evolutionary histories. However, the quantitative proteomics revealed that fitness effects not related to functional proficiency play much larger roles on long evolutionary time scales than previously thought, with particular evidence that some universal biophysical selection pressures act via protein expression levels. This paper first summarizes recent progress in the 21st century towards recovering this universal selection pressure. Then, the paper argues that proteome cost minimization is the dominant, underlying "non-function" selection pressure controlling most of the evolution of already functionally adapted living systems. A theory of proteome cost minimization is described and argued to have consequences for understanding evolutionary trade-offs, aging, cancer, and neurodegenerative protein-misfolding diseases.