学术文献库

It is widely supposed that following unilateral brain injury, there arises an asymmetry in inter-hemispheric inhibition which has an adverse influence upon motor control. I argue that this 'inter-hemispheric imbalance' model arises from a fundamental misunderstanding of the roles played by inter-hemispheric (callosal) projections in mammalian brains. Drawing upon a large body of empirical data, derived largely from animal models, and associated theoretical modeling, it is demonstrated that inter-hemispheric projections perform contrast enhancing and integrative functions via mechanisms such as surround/lateral inhibition. The principal functional unit of callosal influence comprises a facilitatory centre and a depressing peripheral zone, that together shape the influence of converging inputs to pyramidal neurons. Inter-hemispheric inhibition is an instance of a more general feature of mammalian neural systems, whereby inhibitory interneurons act not simply to prevent over-excitation but to sculpt the output of specific circuits. The narrowing of the excitatory focus that occurs through crossed surround inhibition is a highly conserved motif of transcallosal interactions in mammalian sensory and motor cortices. A case is presented that the notion of 'inter-hemispheric imbalance' has been sustained, and clinical interventions derived from this model promoted, by erroneous assumptions concerning that revealed by investigative techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The alternative perspective promoted by the present analysis, also permits the basis of positive (e.g. post stroke) associations between the structural integrity of transcallosal projections and motor capability to be better understood.